Boston Scientific Corporation: Device Recall

Recall Details

Recall Number

Z-2536-2025

Classification

Class II

Product Type

Device

Recalling Firm

Boston Scientific Corporation

Status

Ongoing

Date Initiated

08/05/2025

Location

Maple Grove, MN, United States

Voluntary/Mandated

Voluntary: Firm initiated

Product Quantity

1369 units

Reason for Recall

The Encore 26 Inflation Device is used with balloon dilation catheters to create and monitor pressure in the balloon and to deflate the balloon. An internal investigation determined that during use, foreign material particles could migrate from affected Encore 26 Inflation Devices into a balloon dilatation catheter.

Product Description

Boston Scientific UroMax Ultra Kit, Material Numbers (UPN): 1. M0062251200, 2. M0062251210, 3. M0062251220, 4. M0062251230, 5. M0062251240, 6. M0062251260, 7. M0062251290, 8. M0062251300, 9. M0062251310. 10. M0062251350, 11. M0062251360, 12. M0062251370. (Urology)

Distribution Pattern

Worldwide distribution.

Other Recalls by Boston Scientific Corporation

• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.

View all recalls by Boston Scientific Corporation →