Boston Scientific Corporation: Device Recall

Recall Details

Recall Number

Z-0827-2025

Classification

Class I

Product Type

Device

Recalling Firm

Boston Scientific Corporation

Status

Ongoing

Date Initiated

12/12/2024

Location

Saint Paul, MN, United States

Voluntary/Mandated

Voluntary: Firm initiated

Product Quantity

156,329 units (59,937 US, 96,792 OUS) in total

Reason for Recall

A subset of devices from the ACCOLADE Family of Pacemakers and CRT-Ps, built before September 2018, have an increased potential to initiate Safety Mode during telemetry or other normal, higher-power operations due to latent high battery impedance.

Product Description

VISIONIST CRT-P, EL (Model Number U225 and U226) and EL MRI (Model Number U228)

Distribution Pattern

US (Nationwide) including Puerto Rico and US Virgin Islands and OUS (foreign) to countries of: Guam and Northern Mariana Islands.

Other Recalls by Boston Scientific Corporation

• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.
• Class I: Dangerous 12/19/2025
  Increased reports of stent deployment and expansion issues. The most common outcome reasonably foreseeable resulting from difficulty deploying the stent is prolongation of the procedure to exchange the device for a new one. The most serious reasonably foreseeable outcome in cases where the first flange is unable to deploy or expand would be a cascade of events resulting in additional intervention, either endoscopic or surgical, to remove the stent and close the puncture site.

View all recalls by Boston Scientific Corporation →